Romania vs Sweden: Labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — Labour force
Labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — Labour force over time
- Romania
- Sweden
How they compare
Romania currently reports 4.29 million Persons against 2.64 million Persons in Sweden, a difference of 1.64 million Persons.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.6 times Sweden's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.
Romania ranks 6th and Sweden ranks 8th of 18 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — labour force, Romania or Sweden?
- Romania, at 4.29 million Persons against 2.64 million Persons in Sweden as of 2009.
- What is the difference in labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — labour force between Romania and Sweden?
- 1.64 million Persons, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Sweden?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2009.
- How do Romania and Sweden rank globally for labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — labour force?
- Romania ranks 6th and Sweden ranks 8th of 18 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — Labour force. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides labour market indicators aggregated at national level and broken down by urban-rural territorial typology. Data source and definition The indicators include labour indicators at place of residence by type of territory. Data is based on a labor force survey using ILO methodology and collected from Eurostat (reg_lmk) for EU countries and via delegates of the OECD Working Party on Territorial Indicators (WPTI), as well as from national statistical offices' websites. Territorial typology The OECD classifies TL3 regions as predominantly urban, intermediate or predominantly rural; rural regions can be further split into “close to city” and “remote” (see methodology (pdf)). This typology supports analysis of socio-economic differences across regions. See also the OECD Territorial Correspondence Table (xlsx) and the OECD Territorial grid (pdf). Cite this dataset OECD Regions, Cities and Local Areas database http://oe.cd/geostats Further information OECD Regions and Cities Statistical Atlas OECD Regions and Cities at a Glance For questions and/or comments, please email RegionStat@oecd.org.