Israel vs New Zealand: Labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — Labour force
Labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — Labour force over time
- Israel
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 1.20 million Persons against 1.08 million Persons in Israel, a difference of 126,480 Persons.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Israel's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Israel ranks 16th and New Zealand ranks 14th of 18 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 630,440 Persons | 901,275 Persons | 270,835 Persons | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 767,532 Persons | 1.02 million Persons | 249,538 Persons | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 987,012 Persons | 1.10 million Persons | 115,568 Persons | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — labour force, Israel or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 1.20 million Persons against 1.08 million Persons in Israel as of 2016.
- What is the difference in labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — labour force between Israel and New Zealand?
- 126,480 Persons, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and New Zealand?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2014.
- How do Israel and New Zealand rank globally for labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — labour force?
- Israel ranks 16th and New Zealand ranks 14th of 18 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — Labour force. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides labour market indicators aggregated at national level and broken down by urban-rural territorial typology. Data source and definition The indicators include labour indicators at place of residence by type of territory. Data is based on a labor force survey using ILO methodology and collected from Eurostat (reg_lmk) for EU countries and via delegates of the OECD Working Party on Territorial Indicators (WPTI), as well as from national statistical offices' websites. Territorial typology The OECD classifies TL3 regions as predominantly urban, intermediate or predominantly rural; rural regions can be further split into “close to city” and “remote” (see methodology (pdf)). This typology supports analysis of socio-economic differences across regions. See also the OECD Territorial Correspondence Table (xlsx) and the OECD Territorial grid (pdf). Cite this dataset OECD Regions, Cities and Local Areas database http://oe.cd/geostats Further information OECD Regions and Cities Statistical Atlas OECD Regions and Cities at a Glance For questions and/or comments, please email RegionStat@oecd.org.