Israel vs Luxembourg: Labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — Labour force
Labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — Labour force over time
- Israel
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Israel currently reports 1.08 million Persons against 346,100 Persons in Luxembourg, a difference of 729,520 Persons.
That makes Israel's figure about 3.1 times Luxembourg's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Israel has been ahead every year.
Israel ranks 16th and Luxembourg ranks 17th of 18 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 622,728 Persons | 173,340 Persons | 449,388 Persons | Israel |
| 2000s | 767,532 Persons | 202,110 Persons | 565,422 Persons | Israel |
| 2010s | 987,012 Persons | 246,080 Persons | 740,932 Persons | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — labour force, Israel or Luxembourg?
- Israel, at 1.08 million Persons against 346,100 Persons in Luxembourg as of 2014.
- What is the difference in labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — labour force between Israel and Luxembourg?
- 729,520 Persons, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Luxembourg?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2014.
- How do Israel and Luxembourg rank globally for labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — labour force?
- Israel ranks 16th and Luxembourg ranks 17th of 18 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — Labour force. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides labour market indicators aggregated at national level and broken down by urban-rural territorial typology. Data source and definition The indicators include labour indicators at place of residence by type of territory. Data is based on a labor force survey using ILO methodology and collected from Eurostat (reg_lmk) for EU countries and via delegates of the OECD Working Party on Territorial Indicators (WPTI), as well as from national statistical offices' websites. Territorial typology The OECD classifies TL3 regions as predominantly urban, intermediate or predominantly rural; rural regions can be further split into “close to city” and “remote” (see methodology (pdf)). This typology supports analysis of socio-economic differences across regions. See also the OECD Territorial Correspondence Table (xlsx) and the OECD Territorial grid (pdf). Cite this dataset OECD Regions, Cities and Local Areas database http://oe.cd/geostats Further information OECD Regions and Cities Statistical Atlas OECD Regions and Cities at a Glance For questions and/or comments, please email RegionStat@oecd.org.