Austria vs Israel: Labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — Labour force
Labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — Labour force over time
- Austria
- Israel
How they compare
Austria currently reports 1.16 million Persons against 1.08 million Persons in Israel, a difference of 86,980 Persons.
That makes Austria's figure about 1.1 times Israel's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Austria has been ahead every year.
Austria ranks 15th and Israel ranks 16th of 18 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.05 million Persons | 652,660 Persons | 399,540 Persons | Austria |
| 2000s | 1.11 million Persons | 767,532 Persons | 343,878 Persons | Austria |
| 2010s | 1.16 million Persons | 964,860 Persons | 198,540 Persons | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — labour force, Austria or Israel?
- Austria, at 1.16 million Persons against 1.08 million Persons in Israel as of 2013.
- What is the difference in labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — labour force between Austria and Israel?
- 86,980 Persons, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Israel?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2013.
- How do Austria and Israel rank globally for labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — labour force?
- Austria ranks 15th and Israel ranks 16th of 18 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — Labour force. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides labour market indicators aggregated at national level and broken down by urban-rural territorial typology. Data source and definition The indicators include labour indicators at place of residence by type of territory. Data is based on a labor force survey using ILO methodology and collected from Eurostat (reg_lmk) for EU countries and via delegates of the OECD Working Party on Territorial Indicators (WPTI), as well as from national statistical offices' websites. Territorial typology The OECD classifies TL3 regions as predominantly urban, intermediate or predominantly rural; rural regions can be further split into “close to city” and “remote” (see methodology (pdf)). This typology supports analysis of socio-economic differences across regions. See also the OECD Territorial Correspondence Table (xlsx) and the OECD Territorial grid (pdf). Cite this dataset OECD Regions, Cities and Local Areas database http://oe.cd/geostats Further information OECD Regions and Cities Statistical Atlas OECD Regions and Cities at a Glance For questions and/or comments, please email RegionStat@oecd.org.