Australia vs Denmark: Labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — Labour force

Australia
1.29 million Persons
in 2019
Denmark
1.35 million Persons
in 2014
Australia rank
13th
Denmark rank
12th

Labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — Labour force over time

  • Australia
  • Denmark
0500.0k1.0M1.5M199820082019

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 1.35 million Persons against 1.29 million Persons in Australia, a difference of 60,580 Persons.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 13th and Denmark ranks 12th of 18 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Denmark Difference Ahead
2000s 1.10 million Persons 1.40 million Persons 290,140 Persons Denmark
2010s 1.17 million Persons 1.36 million Persons 186,196 Persons Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — labour force, Australia or Denmark?
Denmark, at 1.35 million Persons against 1.29 million Persons in Australia as of 2014.
What is the difference in labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — labour force between Australia and Denmark?
60,580 Persons, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Denmark?
8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2014.
How do Australia and Denmark rank globally for labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — labour force?
Australia ranks 13th and Denmark ranks 12th of 18 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — Labour force. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Denmark: Labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — Labour force. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/labour-indicators-by-urban-rural-territorial-typology-labour-force/australia/denmark/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/labour-indicators-by-urban-rural-territorial-typology-labour-force/australia/denmark/">Australia vs Denmark: Labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — Labour force</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Labour indicators by urban-rural territorial typology — Labour force
Unit
Persons
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
20 places, 346 data points, 1995–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides labour market indicators aggregated at national level and broken down by urban-rural territorial typology. Data source and definition The indicators include labour indicators at place of residence by type of territory. Data is based on a labor force survey using ILO methodology and collected from Eurostat (reg_lmk) for EU countries and via delegates of the OECD Working Party on Territorial Indicators (WPTI), as well as from national statistical offices' websites. Territorial typology The OECD classifies TL3 regions as predominantly urban, intermediate or predominantly rural; rural regions can be further split into “close to city” and “remote” (see methodology (pdf)). This typology supports analysis of socio-economic differences across regions. See also the OECD Territorial Correspondence Table (xlsx) and the OECD Territorial grid (pdf). Cite this dataset OECD Regions, Cities and Local Areas database http://oe.cd/geostats Further information OECD Regions and Cities Statistical Atlas OECD Regions and Cities at a Glance For questions and/or comments, please email RegionStat@oecd.org.