Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income vs Namibia: Labour income distribution (ILO modelled estimates) (Decile) … annual

Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income
0.0712 % change on previous year
in 2025
Namibia
0.6494 % change on previous year
in 2025
Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income rank
48th
Namibia rank
48th

Labour income distribution (ILO modelled estimates) (Decile) … annual over time

  • Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income
  • Namibia
-50-250255075200520152025

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.6494 % change on previous year against 0.0712 % change on previous year in Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income, a difference of 0.5782 % change on previous year.

That makes Namibia's figure about 9.1 times Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Namibia ahead.

Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income ranks 48th and Namibia ranks 48th of 87 groups.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income Namibia Difference Ahead
2000s 1.65 % change on previous year 2.22 % change on previous year 0.5685 % change on previous year Namibia
2010s 4.07 % change on previous year 11.87 % change on previous year 7.79 % change on previous year Namibia
2020s -0.7138 % change on previous year -0.3583 % change on previous year 0.3555 % change on previous year Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher labour income distribution (ilo modelled estimates) (decile 1), Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income or Namibia?
Namibia, at 0.6494 % change on previous year against 0.0712 % change on previous year in Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income as of 2025.
What is the difference in labour income distribution (ilo modelled estimates) (decile 1) between Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income and Namibia?
0.5782 % change on previous year, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income and Namibia?
21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
How do Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income and Namibia rank globally for labour income distribution (ilo modelled estimates) (decile 1)?
Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income ranks 48th and Namibia ranks 48th of 87 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Labour income distribution (ILO modelled estimates) (Decile 1), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income vs Namibia: Labour income distribution (ILO modelled estimates) (Decile 1). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/labour-income-distribution-ilo-modelled-estimates-decile-1-annual-growth-rate/europe-and-central-asia-upper-middle-income/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/labour-income-distribution-ilo-modelled-estimates-decile-1-annual-growth-rate/europe-and-central-asia-upper-middle-income/namibia/">Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income vs Namibia: Labour income distribution (ILO modelled estimates) (Decile 1)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Labour income distribution (ILO modelled estimates) (Decile 1), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
276 places, 5,782 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Labour income distribution (ILO modelled estimates) (Decile 1). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.