What is the difference in labour force (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per unit of gdp between South Sudan and Tanzania, United Republic of?

0 units per US$ of GDP, with South Sudan ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Tanzania, United Republic of?

8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2015.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

South Sudan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per unit of GDP

South Sudan

0 units per US$ of GDP

in 2015

Tanzania, United Republic of

0 units per US$ of GDP

in 2025

South Sudan rank

14th

Tanzania, United Republic of rank

15th

Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per unit of GDP over time

South Sudan
Tanzania, United Republic of

How they compare

South Sudan currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Tanzania, United Republic of has been ahead every year.

South Sudan ranks 14th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 15th of 185 countries.

Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	South Sudan	Tanzania, United Republic of	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0 units per US$ of GDP	0 units per US$ of GDP	0 units per US$ of GDP	Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s	0 units per US$ of GDP	0 units per US$ of GDP	0 units per US$ of GDP	Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher labour force (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per unit of gdp, South Sudan or Tanzania, United Republic of?: South Sudan, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2015.
What is the difference in labour force (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per unit of gdp between South Sudan and Tanzania, United Republic of?: 0 units per US$ of GDP, with South Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Tanzania, United Republic of?: 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2015.
How do South Sudan and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for labour force (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per unit of gdp?: South Sudan ranks 14th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 15th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Sudan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/labour-force-ilo-modelled-estimates-15-per-unit-of-gdp/south-sudan/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/labour-force-ilo-modelled-estimates-15-per-unit-of-gdp/south-sudan/tanzania/">South Sudan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per unit of GDP
Unit: units per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 188 places, 6,611 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed: 21 August 2026

Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.