Pakistan vs United States Virgin Islands: Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre

Pakistan
0.1059 units per square kilometre
in 2023
United States Virgin Islands
0.1115 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan rank
43rd
United States Virgin Islands rank
40th

Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre over time

  • Pakistan
  • United States Virgin Islands
0.050.0750.10.1250.15199020062023

How they compare

United States Virgin Islands currently reports 0.1115 units per square kilometre against 0.1059 units per square kilometre in Pakistan, a difference of 0.0056 units per square kilometre.

That makes United States Virgin Islands's figure about 1.1 times Pakistan's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, United States Virgin Islands has been ahead every year.

Pakistan ranks 43rd and United States Virgin Islands ranks 40th of 186 countries.

United States Virgin Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan United States Virgin Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0477 units per square kilometre 0.1434 units per square kilometre 0.0957 units per square kilometre United States Virgin Islands
2000s 0.0666 units per square kilometre 0.1458 units per square kilometre 0.0793 units per square kilometre United States Virgin Islands
2010s 0.0878 units per square kilometre 0.1332 units per square kilometre 0.0454 units per square kilometre United States Virgin Islands
2020s 0.1024 units per square kilometre 0.1113 units per square kilometre 0.0089 units per square kilometre United States Virgin Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher labour force (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre, Pakistan or United States Virgin Islands?
United States Virgin Islands, at 0.1115 units per square kilometre against 0.1059 units per square kilometre in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in labour force (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre between Pakistan and United States Virgin Islands?
0.0056 units per square kilometre, with United States Virgin Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and United States Virgin Islands?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Pakistan and United States Virgin Islands rank globally for labour force (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre?
Pakistan ranks 43rd and United States Virgin Islands ranks 40th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs United States Virgin Islands: Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/labour-force-ilo-modelled-estimates-15-per-square-kilometre/pakistan/virgin-islands-u-s/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/labour-force-ilo-modelled-estimates-15-per-square-kilometre/pakistan/virgin-islands-u-s/">Pakistan vs United States Virgin Islands: Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 6,274 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.