Latvia vs Zimbabwe: Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre

Latvia
0.0156 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0168 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia rank
135th
Zimbabwe rank
133rd

Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre over time

  • Latvia
  • Zimbabwe
00.0050.010.0150.02199020062023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0168 units per square kilometre against 0.0156 units per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 0.0012 units per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 135th and Zimbabwe ranks 133rd of 186 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0191 units per square kilometre 0.0105 units per square kilometre 0.0086 units per square kilometre Latvia
2000s 0.0179 units per square kilometre 0.0123 units per square kilometre 0.0056 units per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 0.0163 units per square kilometre 0.0138 units per square kilometre 0.0025 units per square kilometre Latvia
2020s 0.0155 units per square kilometre 0.0158 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher labour force (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre, Latvia or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.0168 units per square kilometre against 0.0156 units per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in labour force (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre between Latvia and Zimbabwe?
0.0012 units per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Zimbabwe?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Zimbabwe rank globally for labour force (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre?
Latvia ranks 135th and Zimbabwe ranks 133rd of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Zimbabwe: Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/labour-force-ilo-modelled-estimates-15-per-square-kilometre/latvia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/labour-force-ilo-modelled-estimates-15-per-square-kilometre/latvia/zimbabwe/">Latvia vs Zimbabwe: Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 6,274 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.