Hong Kong, China vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre

Hong Kong, China
3.62 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa
0.021 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong, China rank
3rd
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
1st

Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
01234199020062023

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 3.62 units per square kilometre against 0.021 units per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 3.6 units per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 172.4 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong, China ranks 3rd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 1st of 186 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 2.98 units per square kilometre 0.0111 units per square kilometre 2.97 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2000s 3.39 units per square kilometre 0.0143 units per square kilometre 3.38 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2010s 3.7 units per square kilometre 0.0169 units per square kilometre 3.68 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2020s 3.69 units per square kilometre 0.0199 units per square kilometre 3.67 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher labour force (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre, Hong Kong, China or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Hong Kong, China, at 3.62 units per square kilometre against 0.021 units per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in labour force (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre between Hong Kong, China and Sub-Saharan Africa?
3.6 units per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Sub-Saharan Africa?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong, China and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for labour force (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre?
Hong Kong, China ranks 3rd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 1st of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/labour-force-ilo-modelled-estimates-15-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/labour-force-ilo-modelled-estimates-15-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/sub-saharan-africa/">Hong Kong, China vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 6,274 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.