How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Zimbabwe?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Estonia vs Zimbabwe: Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre

Estonia

0.0176 units per square kilometre

in 2023

Zimbabwe

0.0168 units per square kilometre

in 2023

Estonia rank

132nd

Zimbabwe rank

133rd

Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre over time

Estonia
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Estonia currently reports 0.0176 units per square kilometre against 0.0168 units per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0008 units per square kilometre.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.

Estonia ranks 132nd and Zimbabwe ranks 133rd of 186 countries.

Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Estonia	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0169 units per square kilometre	0.0105 units per square kilometre	0.0064 units per square kilometre	Estonia
2000s	0.016 units per square kilometre	0.0123 units per square kilometre	0.0038 units per square kilometre	Estonia
2010s	0.016 units per square kilometre	0.0138 units per square kilometre	0.0022 units per square kilometre	Estonia
2020s	0.0169 units per square kilometre	0.0158 units per square kilometre	0.0011 units per square kilometre	Estonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher labour force (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre, Estonia or Zimbabwe?: Estonia, at 0.0176 units per square kilometre against 0.0168 units per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in labour force (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre between Estonia and Zimbabwe?: 0.0008 units per square kilometre, with Estonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Zimbabwe?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Estonia and Zimbabwe rank globally for labour force (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre?: Estonia ranks 132nd and Zimbabwe ranks 133rd of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Estonia vs Zimbabwe: Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/labour-force-ilo-modelled-estimates-15-per-square-kilometre/estonia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/labour-force-ilo-modelled-estimates-15-per-square-kilometre/estonia/zimbabwe/">Estonia vs Zimbabwe: Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre
Unit: units per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 189 places, 6,274 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed: 21 August 2026

Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.