Congo vs New Caledonia: Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre

Congo
0.0073 units per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia
0.0071 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
164th
New Caledonia rank
165th

Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • New Caledonia
00.0020.0040.0060.008199020062023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.0073 units per square kilometre against 0.0071 units per square kilometre in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.0002 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Congo ranks 164th and New Caledonia ranks 165th of 186 countries.

New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0031 units per square kilometre 0.0049 units per square kilometre 0.0018 units per square kilometre New Caledonia
2000s 0.0043 units per square kilometre 0.0061 units per square kilometre 0.0019 units per square kilometre New Caledonia
2010s 0.0059 units per square kilometre 0.0071 units per square kilometre 0.0013 units per square kilometre New Caledonia
2020s 0.0068 units per square kilometre 0.007 units per square kilometre 0.0002 units per square kilometre New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher labour force (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre, Congo or New Caledonia?
Congo, at 0.0073 units per square kilometre against 0.0071 units per square kilometre in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in labour force (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre between Congo and New Caledonia?
0.0002 units per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and New Caledonia?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Congo and New Caledonia rank globally for labour force (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 164th and New Caledonia ranks 165th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs New Caledonia: Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/labour-force-ilo-modelled-estimates-15-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/labour-force-ilo-modelled-estimates-15-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/new-caledonia/">Congo vs New Caledonia: Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 6,274 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.