Chagai vs Hong Kong, China: Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre

Chagai
0.4354 units per square kilometre
in 2021
Hong Kong, China
3.62 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Chagai rank
1st
Hong Kong, China rank
3rd

Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre over time

  • Chagai
  • Hong Kong, China
01234199020062023

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 3.62 units per square kilometre against 0.4354 units per square kilometre in Chagai, a difference of 3.18 units per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 8.3 times Chagai's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Chagai ranks 1st and Hong Kong, China ranks 3rd of 2 regions.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chagai Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
1990s 0.3497 units per square kilometre 2.98 units per square kilometre 2.63 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2000s 0.383 units per square kilometre 3.39 units per square kilometre 3.01 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2010s 0.417 units per square kilometre 3.7 units per square kilometre 3.28 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2020s 0.4325 units per square kilometre 3.73 units per square kilometre 3.3 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher labour force (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre, Chagai or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at 3.62 units per square kilometre against 0.4354 units per square kilometre in Chagai as of 2023.
What is the difference in labour force (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre between Chagai and Hong Kong, China?
3.18 units per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chagai and Hong Kong, China?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Chagai and Hong Kong, China rank globally for labour force (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre?
Chagai ranks 1st and Hong Kong, China ranks 3rd of 2 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chagai vs Hong Kong, China: Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/labour-force-ilo-modelled-estimates-15-per-square-kilometre/channel-islands/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/labour-force-ilo-modelled-estimates-15-per-square-kilometre/channel-islands/hong-kong-sar-china/">Chagai vs Hong Kong, China: Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 6,274 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.