Bahamas vs Eswatini: Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre

Bahamas
0.0242 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
0.0243 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Bahamas rank
119th
Eswatini rank
118th

Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre over time

  • Bahamas
  • Eswatini
00.0050.010.0150.020.025199020062023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.0243 units per square kilometre against 0.0242 units per square kilometre in Bahamas, a difference of 0.0001 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Eswatini ahead.

Bahamas ranks 119th and Eswatini ranks 118th of 186 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Eswatini Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0157 units per square kilometre 0.0163 units per square kilometre 0.0006 units per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 0.0188 units per square kilometre 0.0193 units per square kilometre 0.0005 units per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 0.0222 units per square kilometre 0.0214 units per square kilometre 0.0008 units per square kilometre Bahamas
2020s 0.023 units per square kilometre 0.0233 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher labour force (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre, Bahamas or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 0.0243 units per square kilometre against 0.0242 units per square kilometre in Bahamas as of 2023.
What is the difference in labour force (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre between Bahamas and Eswatini?
0.0001 units per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Eswatini?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Bahamas and Eswatini rank globally for labour force (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre?
Bahamas ranks 119th and Eswatini ranks 118th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Eswatini: Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/labour-force-ilo-modelled-estimates-15-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/labour-force-ilo-modelled-estimates-15-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/eswatini/">Bahamas vs Eswatini: Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 6,274 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.