How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Botswana?

34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Australia vs Botswana: Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre

Australia

0.0019 units per square kilometre

in 2023

Botswana

0.002 units per square kilometre

in 2023

Australia rank

180th

Botswana rank

179th

Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre over time

Australia
Botswana

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 0.002 units per square kilometre against 0.0019 units per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 0.0001 units per square kilometre.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 180th and Botswana ranks 179th of 186 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 3 and Botswana in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Australia	Botswana	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0012 units per square kilometre	0.0009 units per square kilometre	0.0002 units per square kilometre	Australia
2000s	0.0014 units per square kilometre	0.0012 units per square kilometre	0.0001 units per square kilometre	Australia
2010s	0.0016 units per square kilometre	0.0016 units per square kilometre	0.0001 units per square kilometre	Australia
2020s	0.0018 units per square kilometre	0.0019 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher labour force (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre, Australia or Botswana?: Botswana, at 0.002 units per square kilometre against 0.0019 units per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in labour force (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre between Australia and Botswana?: 0.0001 units per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Botswana?: 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Australia and Botswana rank globally for labour force (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre?: Australia ranks 180th and Botswana ranks 179th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Botswana: Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/labour-force-ilo-modelled-estimates-15-per-square-kilometre/australia/botswana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/labour-force-ilo-modelled-estimates-15-per-square-kilometre/australia/botswana/">Australia vs Botswana: Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre
Unit: units per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 189 places, 6,274 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed: 21 August 2026

Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.