Central Asia vs Zimbabwe: Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), annual growth rate

Central Asia
1.45 % change on previous year
in 2027
Zimbabwe
2.97 % change on previous year
in 2027
Central Asia rank
27th
Zimbabwe rank
27th

Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), annual growth rate over time

  • Central Asia
  • Zimbabwe
0246199120092027

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 2.97 % change on previous year against 1.45 % change on previous year in Central Asia, a difference of 1.52 % change on previous year.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 2.0 times Central Asia's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 37 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Central Asia ranks 27th and Zimbabwe ranks 27th of 85 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Central Asia averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Asia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 1.5 % change on previous year 2.46 % change on previous year 0.9555 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2000s 1.52 % change on previous year 1.05 % change on previous year 0.4631 % change on previous year Central Asia
2010s 1.34 % change on previous year 1.53 % change on previous year 0.1878 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2020s 1.5 % change on previous year 2.93 % change on previous year 1.43 % change on previous year Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher labour force (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), annual growth rate, Central Asia or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 2.97 % change on previous year against 1.45 % change on previous year in Central Asia as of 2027.
What is the difference in labour force (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), annual growth rate between Central Asia and Zimbabwe?
1.52 % change on previous year, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Zimbabwe?
37 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2027.
How do Central Asia and Zimbabwe rank globally for labour force (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), annual growth rate?
Central Asia ranks 27th and Zimbabwe ranks 27th of 85 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Asia vs Zimbabwe: Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/labour-force-ilo-modelled-estimates-15-annual-growth-rate/central-asia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/labour-force-ilo-modelled-estimates-15-annual-growth-rate/central-asia/zimbabwe/">Central Asia vs Zimbabwe: Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
276 places, 10,188 data points, 1991–2027
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.