Mozambique vs Rwanda: Labor participation rate, total
Labor participation rate, total over time
- Mozambique
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 92.1% against 91.9% in Mozambique, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Rwanda ahead.
Mozambique ranks 5th and Rwanda ranks 4th of 52 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 88.5% | 87.8% | 0.6% | Mozambique |
| 2000s | 92.0% | 92.4% | 0.4% | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 92.0% | 92.1% | 0.2% | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor participation rate, total, Mozambique or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 92.1% against 91.9% in Mozambique as of 2011.
- What is the difference in labor participation rate, total between Mozambique and Rwanda?
- 0.2%, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Rwanda?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2011.
- How do Mozambique and Rwanda rank globally for labor participation rate, total?
- Mozambique ranks 5th and Rwanda ranks 4th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, Key Indicators of the Labour Market database, published as Labor participation rate, total (% of total population ages 55-64). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Labor force participation rate is the proportion of the population ages 55-64 that is economically active: all people who supply labor for the production of goods and services during a specified period. The participation rates are harmonized to account for differences in national data collection and tabulation methodologies as well as for other country-specific factors such as military service requirements. The series includes both nationally reported and imputed data and only estimates that are national, meaning there are no geographic limitations in coverage.