Botswana vs Congo: Labor participation rate, total
Labor participation rate, total over time
- Botswana
- Congo
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 73.7% against 72.5% in Congo, a difference of 1.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Congo ahead.
Botswana ranks 26th and Congo ranks 29th of 52 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 72.3% | 72.2% | 0.1% | Botswana |
| 2000s | 73.5% | 72.4% | 1.1% | Botswana |
| 2010s | 73.8% | 72.5% | 1.3% | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor participation rate, total, Botswana or Congo?
- Botswana, at 73.7% against 72.5% in Congo as of 2011.
- What is the difference in labor participation rate, total between Botswana and Congo?
- 1.2%, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Congo?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2011.
- How do Botswana and Congo rank globally for labor participation rate, total?
- Botswana ranks 26th and Congo ranks 29th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, Key Indicators of the Labour Market database, published as Labor participation rate, total (% of total population ages 55-64). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Labor force participation rate is the proportion of the population ages 55-64 that is economically active: all people who supply labor for the production of goods and services during a specified period. The participation rates are harmonized to account for differences in national data collection and tabulation methodologies as well as for other country-specific factors such as military service requirements. The series includes both nationally reported and imputed data and only estimates that are national, meaning there are no geographic limitations in coverage.