Mauritius vs Sao Tome and Principe: Labor participation rate, total
Labor participation rate, total over time
- Mauritius
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 76.2% against 74.9% in Mauritius, a difference of 1.3%.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 37th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 36th of 52 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 71.8% | 72.7% | 0.9% | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2000s | 73.0% | 74.7% | 1.7% | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 74.9% | 76.2% | 1.3% | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor participation rate, total, Mauritius or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 76.2% against 74.9% in Mauritius as of 2010.
- What is the difference in labor participation rate, total between Mauritius and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 1.3%, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2010.
- How do Mauritius and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for labor participation rate, total?
- Mauritius ranks 37th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 36th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, Key Indicators of the Labour Market database, published as Labor participation rate, total (% of total population ages 35-54). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Labor force participation rate is the proportion of the population ages 35-54 that is economically active: all people who supply labor for the production of goods and services during a specified period. The participation rates are harmonized to account for differences in national data collection and tabulation methodologies as well as for other country-specific factors such as military service requirements. The series includes both nationally reported and imputed data and only estimates that are national, meaning there are no geographic limitations in coverage.