Mauritius vs Namibia: Labor participation rate, male
Labor participation rate, male over time
- Mauritius
- Namibia
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 68.6% against 65.7% in Namibia, a difference of 2.9%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Namibia ahead.
Mauritius ranks 43rd and Namibia ranks 46th of 52 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 63.4% | 67.9% | 4.5% | Namibia |
| 2000s | 63.0% | 67.4% | 4.4% | Namibia |
| 2010s | 68.6% | 65.7% | 2.9% | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor participation rate, male, Mauritius or Namibia?
- Mauritius, at 68.6% against 65.7% in Namibia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in labor participation rate, male between Mauritius and Namibia?
- 2.9%, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Namibia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2011.
- How do Mauritius and Namibia rank globally for labor participation rate, male?
- Mauritius ranks 43rd and Namibia ranks 46th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, Key Indicators of the Labour Market database, published as Labor participation rate, male (% of male population ages 55-64). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Labor force participation rate is the proportion of the population ages 55-64 that is economically active: all people who supply labor for the production of goods and services during a specified period. The participation rates are harmonized to account for differences in national data collection and tabulation methodologies as well as for other country-specific factors such as military service requirements. The series includes both nationally reported and imputed data and only estimates that are national, meaning there are no geographic limitations in coverage.