North Africa vs Tanzania: Labor participation rate, male
Labor participation rate, male over time
- North Africa
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 97.9% against 94.0% in North Africa, a difference of 3.9%.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Tanzania has been ahead every year.
North Africa ranks 2nd and Tanzania ranks 3rd of 6 groups.
Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Africa | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 93.6% | 97.6% | 3.9% | Tanzania |
| 2000s | 94.4% | 97.7% | 3.3% | Tanzania |
| 2010s | 94.0% | 97.9% | 3.9% | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor participation rate, male, North Africa or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 97.9% against 94.0% in North Africa as of 2011.
- What is the difference in labor participation rate, male between North Africa and Tanzania?
- 3.9%, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Africa and Tanzania?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2010.
- How do North Africa and Tanzania rank globally for labor participation rate, male?
- North Africa ranks 2nd and Tanzania ranks 3rd of 6 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, Key Indicators of the Labour Market database, published as Labor participation rate, male (% of male population ages 25-54). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Labor force participation rate is the proportion of the population ages 25-54 that is economically active: all people who supply labor for the production of goods and services during a specified period. The participation rates are harmonized to account for differences in national data collection and tabulation methodologies as well as for other country-specific factors such as military service requirements. The series includes both nationally reported and imputed data and only estimates that are national, meaning there are no geographic limitations in coverage.