Rwanda vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Labor participation rate, female
Labor participation rate, female over time
- Rwanda
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 96.5% against 96.0% in Rwanda, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Rwanda ahead.
Rwanda ranks 3rd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 2nd of 52 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Tanzania, United Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 94.5% | 94.0% | 0.5% | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 96.1% | 95.8% | 0.3% | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 96.0% | 96.5% | 0.5% | Tanzania, United Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor participation rate, female, Rwanda or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Tanzania, United Republic of, at 96.5% against 96.0% in Rwanda as of 2010.
- What is the difference in labor participation rate, female between Rwanda and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 0.5%, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2010.
- How do Rwanda and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for labor participation rate, female?
- Rwanda ranks 3rd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 2nd of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, Key Indicators of the Labour Market database, published as Labor participation rate, female (% of female population ages 25-34). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Labor force participation rate is the proportion of the population ages 25-34 that is economically active: all people who supply labor for the production of goods and services during a specified period. The participation rates are harmonized to account for differences in national data collection and tabulation methodologies as well as for other country-specific factors such as military service requirements. The series includes both nationally reported and imputed data and only estimates that are national, meaning there are no geographic limitations in coverage.