China vs Russian Federation: Labor market, S1 - Redress measures
China
0.4554
in 2014
Russian Federation
0.4505
in 2014
China rank
69th
Russian Federation rank
71st
Labor market, S1 - Redress measures over time
- China
- Russian Federation
How they compare
China currently reports 0.4554 against 0.4505 in Russian Federation, a difference of 0.0049.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1987 it was Russian Federation ahead.
China ranks 69th and Russian Federation ranks 71st of 90 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Russian Federation in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.5879 | 0.6819 | 0.0941 | Russian Federation |
| 1990s | 0.5118 | 0.6142 | 0.1025 | Russian Federation |
| 2000s | 0.4396 | 0.4772 | 0.0376 | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 0.4554 | 0.4505 | 0.0048 | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor market, s1 - redress measures, China or Russian Federation?
- China, at 0.4554 against 0.4505 in Russian Federation as of 2014.
- What is the difference in labor market, s1 - redress measures between China and Russian Federation?
- 0.0049, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Russian Federation?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2014.
- How do China and Russian Federation rank globally for labor market, s1 - redress measures?
- China ranks 69th and Russian Federation ranks 71st of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Labor market, S1 - Redress measures. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The SRD contains data on a wide range of structural policies across different countries. These policies are things that affect how markets function, like labor laws, regulations on businesses, and trade policies.