South Korea vs Romania: Labor market, S1 - Procedural inconvenience
South Korea
0.73
in 2014
Romania
0.7129
in 2014
South Korea rank
55th
Romania rank
57th
Labor market, S1 - Procedural inconvenience over time
- South Korea
- Romania
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 0.73 against 0.7129 in Romania, a difference of 0.0171.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1973 it was South Korea ahead.
South Korea ranks 55th and Romania ranks 57th of 90 countries.
South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.8564 | 0.5693 | 0.2871 | South Korea |
| 1980s | 0.8564 | 0.5693 | 0.2871 | South Korea |
| 1990s | 0.8215 | 0.5693 | 0.2522 | South Korea |
| 2000s | 0.6926 | 0.6698 | 0.0228 | South Korea |
| 2010s | 0.7241 | 0.7129 | 0.0112 | South Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor market, s1 - procedural inconvenience, South Korea or Romania?
- South Korea, at 0.73 against 0.7129 in Romania as of 2014.
- What is the difference in labor market, s1 - procedural inconvenience between South Korea and Romania?
- 0.0171, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Romania?
- 42 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2014.
- How do South Korea and Romania rank globally for labor market, s1 - procedural inconvenience?
- South Korea ranks 55th and Romania ranks 57th of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Labor market, S1 - Procedural inconvenience. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The SRD contains data on a wide range of structural policies across different countries. These policies are things that affect how markets function, like labor laws, regulations on businesses, and trade policies.