Ecuador vs South Korea: Labor market, S1 - Procedural inconvenience
Ecuador
0.7153
in 2014
South Korea
0.73
in 2014
Ecuador rank
56th
South Korea rank
55th
Labor market, S1 - Procedural inconvenience over time
- Ecuador
- South Korea
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 0.73 against 0.7153 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0147.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1973 it was South Korea ahead.
Ecuador ranks 56th and South Korea ranks 55th of 90 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and South Korea in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | South Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.718 | 0.8564 | 0.1384 | South Korea |
| 1980s | 0.718 | 0.8564 | 0.1384 | South Korea |
| 1990s | 0.7159 | 0.8215 | 0.1056 | South Korea |
| 2000s | 0.7153 | 0.6926 | 0.0227 | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 0.7153 | 0.7241 | 0.0088 | South Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor market, s1 - procedural inconvenience, Ecuador or South Korea?
- South Korea, at 0.73 against 0.7153 in Ecuador as of 2014.
- What is the difference in labor market, s1 - procedural inconvenience between Ecuador and South Korea?
- 0.0147, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Korea?
- 42 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2014.
- How do Ecuador and South Korea rank globally for labor market, s1 - procedural inconvenience?
- Ecuador ranks 56th and South Korea ranks 55th of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Labor market, S1 - Procedural inconvenience. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The SRD contains data on a wide range of structural policies across different countries. These policies are things that affect how markets function, like labor laws, regulations on businesses, and trade policies.