Australia vs Bangladesh: Labor market, S1 - Procedural inconvenience
Australia
0.8018
in 2014
Bangladesh
0.8111
in 2014
Australia rank
43rd
Bangladesh rank
42nd
Labor market, S1 - Procedural inconvenience over time
- Australia
- Bangladesh
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 0.8111 against 0.8018 in Australia, a difference of 0.0093.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 42 shared years of data; in 1973 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 43rd and Bangladesh ranks 42nd of 90 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 4 and Bangladesh in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Bangladesh | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1 | 0.7776 | 0.2224 | Australia |
| 1980s | 1 | 0.7776 | 0.2224 | Australia |
| 1990s | 0.8811 | 0.7776 | 0.1035 | Australia |
| 2000s | 0.8031 | 0.7943 | 0.0088 | Australia |
| 2010s | 0.8018 | 0.829 | 0.0272 | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor market, s1 - procedural inconvenience, Australia or Bangladesh?
- Bangladesh, at 0.8111 against 0.8018 in Australia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in labor market, s1 - procedural inconvenience between Australia and Bangladesh?
- 0.0093, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Bangladesh?
- 42 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2014.
- How do Australia and Bangladesh rank globally for labor market, s1 - procedural inconvenience?
- Australia ranks 43rd and Bangladesh ranks 42nd of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Labor market, S1 - Procedural inconvenience. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The SRD contains data on a wide range of structural policies across different countries. These policies are things that affect how markets function, like labor laws, regulations on businesses, and trade policies.