United Kingdom vs Zimbabwe: Labor market, S1 - Firing costs
United Kingdom
0.8448
in 2014
Zimbabwe
0.8602
in 2014
United Kingdom rank
22nd
Zimbabwe rank
19th
Labor market, S1 - Firing costs over time
- United Kingdom
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 0.8602 against 0.8448 in United Kingdom, a difference of 0.0154.
Across all 42 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
United Kingdom ranks 22nd and Zimbabwe ranks 19th of 90 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | United Kingdom | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.8487 | 0.8861 | 0.0374 | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 0.8367 | 0.8854 | 0.0487 | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 0.8237 | 0.8643 | 0.0407 | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 0.8448 | 0.8633 | 0.0184 | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 0.8448 | 0.8602 | 0.0153 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor market, s1 - firing costs, United Kingdom or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 0.8602 against 0.8448 in United Kingdom as of 2014.
- What is the difference in labor market, s1 - firing costs between United Kingdom and Zimbabwe?
- 0.0154, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for United Kingdom and Zimbabwe?
- 42 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2014.
- How do United Kingdom and Zimbabwe rank globally for labor market, s1 - firing costs?
- United Kingdom ranks 22nd and Zimbabwe ranks 19th of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Labor market, S1 - Firing costs. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The SRD contains data on a wide range of structural policies across different countries. These policies are things that affect how markets function, like labor laws, regulations on businesses, and trade policies.