Hong Kong vs Latvia: Labor market, S1 - Firing costs
Hong Kong
0.5827
in 2014
Latvia
0.5711
in 2014
Hong Kong rank
62nd
Latvia rank
64th
Labor market, S1 - Firing costs over time
- Hong Kong
- Latvia
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 0.5827 against 0.5711 in Latvia, a difference of 0.0116.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1973 it was Latvia ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 62nd and Latvia ranks 64th of 90 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.8037 | 0.913 | 0.1092 | Latvia |
| 1980s | 0.7137 | 0.8433 | 0.1296 | Latvia |
| 1990s | 0.6141 | 0.5694 | 0.0447 | Hong Kong |
| 2000s | 0.5827 | 0.6189 | 0.0361 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.5827 | 0.5711 | 0.0116 | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor market, s1 - firing costs, Hong Kong or Latvia?
- Hong Kong, at 0.5827 against 0.5711 in Latvia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in labor market, s1 - firing costs between Hong Kong and Latvia?
- 0.0116, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Latvia?
- 42 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2014.
- How do Hong Kong and Latvia rank globally for labor market, s1 - firing costs?
- Hong Kong ranks 62nd and Latvia ranks 64th of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Labor market, S1 - Firing costs. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The SRD contains data on a wide range of structural policies across different countries. These policies are things that affect how markets function, like labor laws, regulations on businesses, and trade policies.