China vs Lithuania: Labor market, S1 - Firing costs
China
0.3148
in 2014
Lithuania
0.2536
in 2014
China rank
84th
Lithuania rank
87th
Labor market, S1 - Firing costs over time
- China
- Lithuania
How they compare
China currently reports 0.3148 against 0.2536 in Lithuania, a difference of 0.0612.
That makes China's figure about 1.2 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 28 shared years of data; in 1987 it was Lithuania ahead.
China ranks 84th and Lithuania ranks 87th of 90 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 2 and Lithuania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0.6808 | 0.6808 | Lithuania |
| 1990s | 0.1574 | 0.3865 | 0.2291 | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 0.3148 | 0.2758 | 0.039 | China |
| 2010s | 0.3148 | 0.2536 | 0.0612 | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor market, s1 - firing costs, China or Lithuania?
- China, at 0.3148 against 0.2536 in Lithuania as of 2014.
- What is the difference in labor market, s1 - firing costs between China and Lithuania?
- 0.0612, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Lithuania?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2014.
- How do China and Lithuania rank globally for labor market, s1 - firing costs?
- China ranks 84th and Lithuania ranks 87th of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Labor market, S1 - Firing costs. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The SRD contains data on a wide range of structural policies across different countries. These policies are things that affect how markets function, like labor laws, regulations on businesses, and trade policies.