Australia vs Zimbabwe: Labor market, S1 - Firing costs
Australia
0.8671
in 2014
Zimbabwe
0.8602
in 2014
Australia rank
17th
Zimbabwe rank
19th
Labor market, S1 - Firing costs over time
- Australia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0.8671 against 0.8602 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0069.
Across all 42 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 17th and Zimbabwe ranks 19th of 90 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1 | 0.8861 | 0.1139 | Australia |
| 1980s | 1 | 0.8854 | 0.1146 | Australia |
| 1990s | 0.9527 | 0.8643 | 0.0883 | Australia |
| 2000s | 0.9211 | 0.8633 | 0.0578 | Australia |
| 2010s | 0.8671 | 0.8602 | 0.007 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor market, s1 - firing costs, Australia or Zimbabwe?
- Australia, at 0.8671 against 0.8602 in Zimbabwe as of 2014.
- What is the difference in labor market, s1 - firing costs between Australia and Zimbabwe?
- 0.0069, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Zimbabwe?
- 42 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2014.
- How do Australia and Zimbabwe rank globally for labor market, s1 - firing costs?
- Australia ranks 17th and Zimbabwe ranks 19th of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Labor market, S1 - Firing costs. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The SRD contains data on a wide range of structural policies across different countries. These policies are things that affect how markets function, like labor laws, regulations on businesses, and trade policies.