Finland vs Latvia: Labor market, S1 - Additional requirements for collective dismissal
Finland
0.7265
in 2014
Latvia
0.7333
in 2014
Finland rank
69th
Latvia rank
68th
Labor market, S1 - Additional requirements for collective dismissal over time
- Finland
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.7333 against 0.7265 in Finland, a difference of 0.0068.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1973 it was Latvia ahead.
Finland ranks 69th and Latvia ranks 68th of 90 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.9768 | 1 | 0.0232 | Latvia |
| 1980s | 0.845 | 1 | 0.155 | Latvia |
| 1990s | 0.8 | 1 | 0.2 | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0.7466 | 0.7824 | 0.0359 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.7265 | 0.7333 | 0.0068 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor market, s1 - additional requirements for collective dismissal, Finland or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 0.7333 against 0.7265 in Finland as of 2014.
- What is the difference in labor market, s1 - additional requirements for collective dismissal between Finland and Latvia?
- 0.0068, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Latvia?
- 42 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2014.
- How do Finland and Latvia rank globally for labor market, s1 - additional requirements for collective dismissal?
- Finland ranks 69th and Latvia ranks 68th of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Labor market, S1 - Additional requirements for collective dismissal. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The SRD contains data on a wide range of structural policies across different countries. These policies are things that affect how markets function, like labor laws, regulations on businesses, and trade policies.