Ecuador vs Japan: Labor market, S1 - Additional requirements for collective dismissal
Ecuador
0.8425
in 2014
Japan
0.8534
in 2014
Ecuador rank
49th
Japan rank
47th
Labor market, S1 - Additional requirements for collective dismissal over time
- Ecuador
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 0.8534 against 0.8425 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0109.
Across all 42 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 49th and Japan ranks 47th of 90 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.7497 | 0.8534 | 0.1036 | Japan |
| 1980s | 0.7496 | 0.8534 | 0.1038 | Japan |
| 1990s | 0.8239 | 0.8534 | 0.0295 | Japan |
| 2000s | 0.8425 | 0.8534 | 0.0109 | Japan |
| 2010s | 0.8425 | 0.8534 | 0.0109 | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor market, s1 - additional requirements for collective dismissal, Ecuador or Japan?
- Japan, at 0.8534 against 0.8425 in Ecuador as of 2014.
- What is the difference in labor market, s1 - additional requirements for collective dismissal between Ecuador and Japan?
- 0.0109, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Japan?
- 42 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2014.
- How do Ecuador and Japan rank globally for labor market, s1 - additional requirements for collective dismissal?
- Ecuador ranks 49th and Japan ranks 47th of 90 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Labor market, S1 - Additional requirements for collective dismissal. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The SRD contains data on a wide range of structural policies across different countries. These policies are things that affect how markets function, like labor laws, regulations on businesses, and trade policies.