Sri Lanka vs Tunisia: Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs … gaps
Sri Lanka
16.21
in 2024
Tunisia
14.84
in 2023
Sri Lanka rank
158th
Tunisia rank
161st
Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs … gaps over time
- Sri Lanka
- Tunisia
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 16.21 against 14.84 in Tunisia, a difference of 1.37.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 1989 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 158th and Tunisia ranks 161st of 171 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 4 and Tunisia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 42.38 | 26.24 | 16.14 | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 35.34 | 28.33 | 7.01 | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 28.97 | 20.22 | 8.75 | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 22.98 | 21.01 | 1.98 | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 17.93 | 19.64 | 1.71 | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980, Sri Lanka or Tunisia?
- Sri Lanka, at 16.21 against 14.84 in Tunisia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 between Sri Lanka and Tunisia?
- 1.37, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Tunisia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 1989 to 2023.
- How do Sri Lanka and Tunisia rank globally for labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980?
- Sri Lanka ranks 158th and Tunisia ranks 161st of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 with 625 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.