Saudi Arabia vs East Timor: Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs … gaps
Saudi Arabia
18.29
in 2025
East Timor
18.58
in 2022
Saudi Arabia rank
154th
East Timor rank
152nd
Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs … gaps over time
- Saudi Arabia
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 18.58 against 18.29 in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.29.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2009 it was East Timor ahead.
Saudi Arabia ranks 154th and East Timor ranks 152nd of 171 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Saudi Arabia averaged higher in 1 and East Timor in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saudi Arabia | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.46 | 18.34 | 11.87 | East Timor |
| 2010s | 7.85 | 21.56 | 13.71 | East Timor |
| 2020s | 15.32 | 14 | 1.32 | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980, Saudi Arabia or East Timor?
- East Timor, at 18.58 against 18.29 in Saudi Arabia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 between Saudi Arabia and East Timor?
- 0.29, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and East Timor?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2022.
- How do Saudi Arabia and East Timor rank globally for labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 154th and East Timor ranks 152nd of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 with 625 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.