Rwanda vs United States: Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs … gaps
Rwanda
54.94
in 2025
United States
54.88
in 2025
Rwanda rank
21st
United States rank
22nd
Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs … gaps over time
- Rwanda
- United States
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 54.94 against 54.88 in United States, a difference of 0.06.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1978 it was Rwanda ahead.
Rwanda ranks 21st and United States ranks 22nd of 171 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 2 and United States in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | United States | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 91.75 | 61.7 | 30.05 | Rwanda |
| 1990s | 79.26 | 62.39 | 16.87 | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 48.87 | 54.18 | 5.32 | United States |
| 2020s | 43.6 | 54.76 | 11.16 | United States |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980, Rwanda or United States?
- Rwanda, at 54.94 against 54.88 in United States as of 2025.
- What is the difference in labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 between Rwanda and United States?
- 0.06, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and United States?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 2025.
- How do Rwanda and United States rank globally for labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980?
- Rwanda ranks 21st and United States ranks 22nd of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 with 625 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.