Rwanda vs Sweden: Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs … gaps
Rwanda
54.94
in 2025
Sweden
57.3
in 2025
Rwanda rank
21st
Sweden rank
19th
Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs … gaps over time
- Rwanda
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 57.3 against 54.94 in Rwanda, a difference of 2.36.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Rwanda ahead.
Rwanda ranks 21st and Sweden ranks 19th of 171 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 79.26 | 42.63 | 36.63 | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 48.87 | 55.86 | 6.99 | Sweden |
| 2020s | 43.6 | 55.78 | 12.18 | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980, Rwanda or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 57.3 against 54.94 in Rwanda as of 2025.
- What is the difference in labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 between Rwanda and Sweden?
- 2.36, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sweden?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Rwanda and Sweden rank globally for labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980?
- Rwanda ranks 21st and Sweden ranks 19th of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 with 625 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.