Norway vs Tanzania: Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs … gaps
Norway
68.6
in 2025
Tanzania
69.02
in 2024
Norway rank
6th
Tanzania rank
5th
Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs … gaps over time
- Norway
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 69.02 against 68.6 in Norway, a difference of 0.42.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Tanzania ahead.
Norway ranks 6th and Tanzania ranks 5th of 171 countries.
Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Norway | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60.76 | 80.16 | 19.4 | Tanzania |
| 2010s | 57.1 | 64.37 | 7.27 | Tanzania |
| 2020s | 63.28 | 67.5 | 4.22 | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980, Norway or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 69.02 against 68.6 in Norway as of 2024.
- What is the difference in labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 between Norway and Tanzania?
- 0.42, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Tanzania?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Norway and Tanzania rank globally for labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980?
- Norway ranks 6th and Tanzania ranks 5th of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 with 625 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.