Namibia vs Russia: Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs … gaps
Namibia
26.43
in 2018
Russia
25.78
in 2025
Namibia rank
126th
Russia rank
127th
Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs … gaps over time
- Namibia
- Russia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 26.43 against 25.78 in Russia, a difference of 0.65.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Russia ahead.
Namibia ranks 126th and Russia ranks 127th of 171 countries.
Russia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 32.2 | 44.94 | 12.74 | Russia |
| 2000s | 32.87 | 36.79 | 3.92 | Russia |
| 2010s | 31.78 | 34.29 | 2.51 | Russia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980, Namibia or Russia?
- Namibia, at 26.43 against 25.78 in Russia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 between Namibia and Russia?
- 0.65, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Russia?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2018.
- How do Namibia and Russia rank globally for labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980?
- Namibia ranks 126th and Russia ranks 127th of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 with 625 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.