Mexico vs Singapore: Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs … gaps
Mexico
32.69
in 2025
Singapore
32.87
in 2025
Mexico rank
96th
Singapore rank
94th
Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs … gaps over time
- Mexico
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 32.87 against 32.69 in Mexico, a difference of 0.18.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Singapore ahead.
Mexico ranks 96th and Singapore ranks 94th of 171 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 30.53 | 54.57 | 24.04 | Singapore |
| 1980s | 31.73 | 58.63 | 26.9 | Singapore |
| 1990s | 23.02 | 51.8 | 28.78 | Singapore |
| 2000s | 34.4 | 36.08 | 1.68 | Singapore |
| 2010s | 32.26 | 36.75 | 4.49 | Singapore |
| 2020s | 32.64 | 35.47 | 2.84 | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980, Mexico or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 32.87 against 32.69 in Mexico as of 2025.
- What is the difference in labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 between Mexico and Singapore?
- 0.18, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Singapore?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2025.
- How do Mexico and Singapore rank globally for labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980?
- Mexico ranks 96th and Singapore ranks 94th of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 with 625 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.