Guatemala vs Macao: Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs … gaps
Guatemala
44.71
in 2024
Macao
45.85
in 2016
Guatemala rank
47th
Macao rank
45th
Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs … gaps over time
- Guatemala
- Macao
How they compare
Macao currently reports 45.85 against 44.71 in Guatemala, a difference of 1.14.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Macao ahead.
Guatemala ranks 47th and Macao ranks 45th of 171 countries.
Macao has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Macao | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 22.9 | 50.43 | 27.53 | Macao |
| 2000s | 38.45 | 42.69 | 4.24 | Macao |
| 2010s | 34.18 | 50.42 | 16.24 | Macao |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980, Guatemala or Macao?
- Macao, at 45.85 against 44.71 in Guatemala as of 2016.
- What is the difference in labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 between Guatemala and Macao?
- 1.14, with Macao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Macao?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2016.
- How do Guatemala and Macao rank globally for labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980?
- Guatemala ranks 47th and Macao ranks 45th of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 with 625 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.