Ecuador vs Portugal: Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs … gaps
Ecuador
32.31
in 2025
Portugal
32.3
in 2025
Ecuador rank
100th
Portugal rank
101st
Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs … gaps over time
- Ecuador
- Portugal
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 32.31 against 32.3 in Portugal, a difference of 0.01.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Portugal ahead.
Ecuador ranks 100th and Portugal ranks 101st of 171 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Portugal in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 29.01 | 58.6 | 29.59 | Portugal |
| 1990s | 36.67 | 43.31 | 6.64 | Portugal |
| 2000s | 40.59 | 39.15 | 1.44 | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 32.22 | 33.41 | 1.19 | Portugal |
| 2020s | 33.4 | 30.49 | 2.92 | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980, Ecuador or Portugal?
- Ecuador, at 32.31 against 32.3 in Portugal as of 2025.
- What is the difference in labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 between Ecuador and Portugal?
- 0.01, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Portugal?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2025.
- How do Ecuador and Portugal rank globally for labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980?
- Ecuador ranks 100th and Portugal ranks 101st of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 with 625 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.