Croatia vs Serbia: Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs … gaps
Croatia
23.6
in 2025
Serbia
24.32
in 2025
Croatia rank
138th
Serbia rank
135th
Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs … gaps over time
- Croatia
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 24.32 against 23.6 in Croatia, a difference of 0.72.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 138th and Serbia ranks 135th of 171 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30.73 | 27.41 | 3.32 | Croatia |
| 2010s | 28.19 | 22.47 | 5.73 | Croatia |
| 2020s | 25.93 | 24.23 | 1.7 | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980, Croatia or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 24.32 against 23.6 in Croatia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 between Croatia and Serbia?
- 0.72, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Serbia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
- How do Croatia and Serbia rank globally for labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980?
- Croatia ranks 138th and Serbia ranks 135th of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 with 625 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.