Cayman Islands vs Sweden: Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs … gaps
Cayman Islands
58.98
in 2015
Sweden
57.3
in 2025
Cayman Islands rank
16th
Sweden rank
19th
Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs … gaps over time
- Cayman Islands
- Sweden
How they compare
Cayman Islands currently reports 58.98 against 57.3 in Sweden, a difference of 1.68.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1989 it was Cayman Islands ahead.
Cayman Islands ranks 16th and Sweden ranks 19th of 171 countries.
Cayman Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cayman Islands | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 71.54 | 69.04 | 2.5 | Cayman Islands |
| 2000s | 56.38 | 52.17 | 4.21 | Cayman Islands |
| 2010s | 56.23 | 54.21 | 2.02 | Cayman Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980, Cayman Islands or Sweden?
- Cayman Islands, at 58.98 against 57.3 in Sweden as of 2015.
- What is the difference in labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 between Cayman Islands and Sweden?
- 1.68, with Cayman Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cayman Islands and Sweden?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1989 to 2015.
- How do Cayman Islands and Sweden rank globally for labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980?
- Cayman Islands ranks 16th and Sweden ranks 19th of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 with 625 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.