Bosnia and Herzegovina vs East Timor: Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs … gaps
Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs … gaps over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 18.58 against 16.63 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 1.95.
That makes East Timor's figure about 1.1 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2001 it was East Timor ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 155th and East Timor ranks 152nd of 171 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 2 and East Timor in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.84 | 28.49 | 3.65 | East Timor |
| 2010s | 22.61 | 21.56 | 1.05 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2020s | 23.81 | 14 | 9.81 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980, Bosnia and Herzegovina or East Timor?
- East Timor, at 18.58 against 16.63 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2022.
- What is the difference in labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 between Bosnia and Herzegovina and East Timor?
- 1.95, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and East Timor?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and East Timor rank globally for labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 155th and East Timor ranks 152nd of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 with 625 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.