Bhutan vs Czechia: Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs … gaps
Bhutan
24.97
in 2025
Czechia
24.8
in 2025
Bhutan rank
132nd
Czechia rank
133rd
Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs … gaps over time
- Bhutan
- Czechia
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 24.97 against 24.8 in Czechia, a difference of 0.17.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 132nd and Czechia ranks 133rd of 171 countries.
Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.33 | 27.4 | 18.93 | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 31.6 | 25.96 | 5.64 | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 28.1 | 23.29 | 4.8 | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980, Bhutan or Czechia?
- Bhutan, at 24.97 against 24.8 in Czechia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 between Bhutan and Czechia?
- 0.17, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Czechia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Bhutan and Czechia rank globally for labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980?
- Bhutan ranks 132nd and Czechia ranks 133rd of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 with 625 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.