Argentina vs Jamaica: Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs … gaps
Argentina
34.5
in 2025
Jamaica
34.26
in 2023
Argentina rank
80th
Jamaica rank
83rd
Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs … gaps over time
- Argentina
- Jamaica
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 34.5 against 34.26 in Jamaica, a difference of 0.24.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Jamaica ahead.
Argentina ranks 80th and Jamaica ranks 83rd of 171 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 3 and Jamaica in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Jamaica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 36.63 | 58.92 | 22.29 | Jamaica |
| 1970s | 38.09 | 44.95 | 6.86 | Jamaica |
| 1980s | 36.61 | 34.15 | 2.46 | Argentina |
| 1990s | 41.5 | 43.16 | 1.65 | Jamaica |
| 2000s | 36.72 | 32.33 | 4.38 | Argentina |
| 2010s | 31.4 | 29.28 | 2.12 | Argentina |
| 2020s | 31.58 | 31.82 | 0.2415 | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980, Argentina or Jamaica?
- Argentina, at 34.5 against 34.26 in Jamaica as of 2025.
- What is the difference in labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 between Argentina and Jamaica?
- 0.24, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Jamaica?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Jamaica rank globally for labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980?
- Argentina ranks 80th and Jamaica ranks 83rd of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 with 625 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.