Uganda vs Zimbabwe: Labor force, male
Uganda
50.7%
in 2011
Zimbabwe
50.7%
in 2011
Uganda rank
43rd
Zimbabwe rank
44th
Labor force, male over time
- Uganda
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 50.7% against 50.7% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Uganda ranks 43rd and Zimbabwe ranks 44th of 52 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Uganda averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Uganda | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 49.5% | 53.8% | 4.3% | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 50.4% | 51.6% | 1.2% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 50.7% | 50.7% | 0.1% | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor force, male, Uganda or Zimbabwe?
- Uganda, at 50.7% against 50.7% in Zimbabwe as of 2011.
- What is the difference in labor force, male between Uganda and Zimbabwe?
- 0.0%, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Uganda and Zimbabwe?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2011.
- How do Uganda and Zimbabwe rank globally for labor force, male?
- Uganda ranks 43rd and Zimbabwe ranks 44th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, using World Bank population estimates, published as Labor force, male (% of total labor force). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Male labor force as a percentage of the total show the extent to which men are active in the labor force. Labor force comprises people ages 15 and older who meet the International Labour Organization's definition of the economically active population.