Congo vs Zimbabwe: Labor force, male
Congo
51.4%
in 2011
Zimbabwe
50.7%
in 2011
Congo rank
41st
Zimbabwe rank
44th
Labor force, male over time
- Congo
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Congo currently reports 51.4% against 50.7% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 41st and Zimbabwe ranks 44th of 52 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 53.2% | 53.8% | 0.6% | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 51.5% | 51.6% | 0.2% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 51.4% | 50.7% | 0.7% | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor force, male, Congo or Zimbabwe?
- Congo, at 51.4% against 50.7% in Zimbabwe as of 2011.
- What is the difference in labor force, male between Congo and Zimbabwe?
- 0.7%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Zimbabwe?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2011.
- How do Congo and Zimbabwe rank globally for labor force, male?
- Congo ranks 41st and Zimbabwe ranks 44th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, using World Bank population estimates, published as Labor force, male (% of total labor force). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Male labor force as a percentage of the total show the extent to which men are active in the labor force. Labor force comprises people ages 15 and older who meet the International Labour Organization's definition of the economically active population.