Lesotho vs Namibia: Labor force (15-64 years), male
Labor force (15-64 years), male over time
- Lesotho
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 587,746 against 571,418 in Lesotho, a difference of 16,328.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Lesotho ahead.
Lesotho ranks 42nd and Namibia ranks 41st of 52 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 359,900 | 282,900 | 77,000 | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 502,996 | 481,727 | 21,269 | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 565,069 | 579,996 | 14,927 | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor force (15-64 years), male, Lesotho or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 587,746 against 571,418 in Lesotho as of 2011.
- What is the difference in labor force (15-64 years), male between Lesotho and Namibia?
- 16,328, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Namibia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2011.
- How do Lesotho and Namibia rank globally for labor force (15-64 years), male?
- Lesotho ranks 42nd and Namibia ranks 41st of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, Key Indicators of the Labour Market database, published as Labor force (15-64 years), male. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The labor force comprising people ages 15 to 64 who meet the International Labour Organization definition of the economically active population: all people who supply labor for the production of goods and services during a specified period. It includes both the employed and the unemployed. While national practices vary in the treatment of such groups as the armed forces and seasonal or part-time workers, in general the labor force includes the armed forces, the unemployed, and first-time job-seekers, but excludes homemakers and other unpaid caregivers and workers in the informal sector.