Botswana vs Congo: Labor force (15-64 years), female
Labor force (15-64 years), female over time
- Botswana
- Congo
How they compare
Congo currently reports 934,423 against 565,923 in Botswana, a difference of 368,500.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.7 times Botswana's.
Across all 22 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 39th and Congo ranks 36th of 52 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 308,600 | 461,000 | 152,400 | Congo |
| 2000s | 488,694 | 767,427 | 278,733 | Congo |
| 2010s | 561,446 | 923,094 | 361,648 | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor force (15-64 years), female, Botswana or Congo?
- Congo, at 934,423 against 565,923 in Botswana as of 2011.
- What is the difference in labor force (15-64 years), female between Botswana and Congo?
- 368,500, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Congo?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2011.
- How do Botswana and Congo rank globally for labor force (15-64 years), female?
- Botswana ranks 39th and Congo ranks 36th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, Key Indicators of the Labour Market database, published as Labor force (15-64 years), female. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The labor force comprising people ages 15 to 64 who meet the International Labour Organization definition of the economically active population: all people who supply labor for the production of goods and services during a specified period. It includes both the employed and the unemployed. While national practices vary in the treatment of such groups as the armed forces and seasonal or part-time workers, in general the labor force includes the armed forces, the unemployed, and first-time job-seekers, but excludes homemakers and other unpaid caregivers and workers in the informal sector.